# MILA

- **Event:** [RAISE Summit Hackathon](https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon)
- **When:** Jul 4 at 9:00 AM – Jul 5 at 7:00 PM (GMT+2)
- **Where:** Paris, France
- **Team:** [Eli Benbaruk](https://cerebralvalley.ai/u/ebenbaruk), [Raphael POUNGAVANON](https://cerebralvalley.ai/u/monark), [Adrien Tirlemont](https://cerebralvalley.ai/u/AXT)
- **GitHub:** https://github.com/Meatisdelicious/raise-summit-hackathon-2026
- **Demo video:** https://youtu.be/PRmX0yMWHyc
- **Gallery:** https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery
- **Page:** https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/89

The problem
During an IVF stimulation cycle, a patient is monitored every 24–48 h with serial hormone draws (estradiol, LH, progesterone) and follicle scans. A clinician writes a follow-up instruction — "repeat this within 24 h", "watch the progesterone", "she's a high responder" — and then the cycle moves fast. Records fragment across the lab system, the scan report and the clinician's note. The single most time-critical complication, OHSS (Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome), announces itself precisely in the trajectory: a steep estradiol rise per day, a high estradiol-per-follicle, PCOS. Miss the window and it becomes an emergency.

The failure mode isn't a lack of data — it's that nobody rebuilds the trajectory, checks it against the protocol, and raises the flag in time.

The idea
For every new serial result, Mila:

rebuilds the patient's hormone trajectory from her fragmented records,
runs deterministic calculators (rate-of-rise, OHSS composite, progesterone-for-cycle-day, response-curve…),
conditionally retrieves the governing protocol/SOP article — only the one the computation calls for,
drafts a cited monitoring brief with an escalation flag,
and hands it to a human biologist to validate before anything reaches the clinic.
It answers one operational question — never a clinical one:

Is there sufficient documented evidence that the requested follow-up was completed, and if not, what workflow task should staff review next?

It does not diagnose, interpret whether a value is medically abnormal, recommend treatment, or prescribe. The LLM proposes; deterministic code disposes.

## More from RAISE Summit Hackathon

- [croissants](https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/86)
- [Bluemoon](https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/87)
- [DriftRadar](https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/88)
- [GrAIt](https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/90)
- [Weave](https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/91)
- [AlphaGo](https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/92)

---

Markdown version of https://cerebralvalley.ai/e/raise-summit-hackathon/hackathon/gallery/89. Site index for agents: https://cerebralvalley.ai/llms.txt · full text: https://cerebralvalley.ai/llms-full.txt